• rinaldo imperiale

The Water of our Time

Contents: The basic order and the structures of every molecule in the tap drinking water have been destroyed. Energetic content is questioned. Can rising water molecules combine with information around the globe?

According to the principle of logic, one should stick to fresh natural spring water.

The information content should be nicer.

(Physics - metaphysics)

In which direction should the tree of knowledge about water begin? It would be easy if people had not collected so much research and information about water until today. But the quality that we take from knowledge from textbooks = literature and the knowledge that is available to us citizens in magazines deals with completely different topics. In essence, I would like to pay attention to the energetic part of “Our water” in this contribution. Briefly explained energetically. Healthy, untouched water from nature looks beautiful under laboratory conditions. As beautiful as a snowflake, a crystal. We find a structure in every water molecule, each one unique. Like a fingerprint, a DNA. The structures that show clean natural water are not only beautiful but also look mathematically correct. Symmetrical, uniform and unique. Each branch of the flake can be viewed at a measurable angle. But water from the pipes no longer shows this healthy order of the water molecules.

The structure no longer exists.

A comparison to this, foods that have been processed are processed very poorly by our body. This plays a major role in fruit and fructose. Fruit throughout your meal is much healthier than the squeezed juice. So you read it again and again. Can you see a parallel here?

We humans have always researched Bigger and bigger in many areas of life and that over a long period of time. Only with technical progress was it possible for us to discover even the smallest microscopic elements and to grasp them visually. Our drinking water in Germany is drinkable, it is in magazines and is often recommended. The Drinking Water Ordinance and a Drinking Water Act complete the whole and should also clear up any last doubts.

Without a doubt, there are also limit values ​​for drinking water in what amount of pollution is allowed. It has to be said here that it has not been clearly and long enough researched what and which amount is actually harmful. The limit values ​​could also be lower, but the problem is that the pollution has risen steadily in recent years. Even with more effort to clean the water, you would not get these values ​​below the old limits again. In short, you simply raise the limit values.

The framework in which our tap water is tested in the laboratory and the areas that are included in the assessment of the water quality are severely limited.

So although officially much more input about “Our water exists”, I and you are only given part of the whole. OK. That's the way it is. Fortunately, one can deal much more profoundly than ever before with knowledge about water. The Internet and the many publications make it possible. The double-edged sword of publications unfortunately always consists of two parties. Some make money from water. Here you will find researchers and scientists who write articles on behalf of the companies and commission studies that should outshine any criticism of the others. The lobbyists. The other party fights for education among the population and ultimately campaigns for the well-being of society.

Not everyone has heard that the water has an anomaly at 4 degrees. Anomalies are not too common in our previously accumulated knowledge. Googled. Science says it is comparable to the circle number “Pi” 3.14 which leads you to infinity.

Over the years, a large scientific branch has emerged that has dealt with the structure of all possible water qualities. These include spring water, natural mineral water, ground water, mountain water, sea water, dead water, sea water, well water, pond water, distilled water and some others. Even sacred sources have been studied. Holy sources can be particularly emphasized here. There is, for example, a water source near “Mecca”, which stands out again because of its beauty in the manner in which it is shaped. In a photo competition, you would put them on a podium.

It was interesting for me because I started using tap water as drinking water. It is also recommended. Simple and always available. It is advertised inexpensively and in an environmentally friendly manner under this sign and is partly correct. Whereby the bees from the marketing world are legally cheered for absolute freedom from fools. So there are areas where “freedom” is very important. According to current knowledge, drinking water in the form of tap water is harmless. At the same time, there are still no long-term studies from which a pro or a negative could be derived. All in all, the lines read, but only. Tap water is even offered at public utility events. Last but not least, it only costs a fraction. Chilled to refrigerator temperature, it is also good to drink, in my experience. Here in my city there are actually 2 degree temperature differences when the water comes out of the pipe. It's warmer here. Our taste receptors are learnable and adaptable. No problem.

We Germans like to save, but too often at the wrong corner. Good advertising is partly to blame for this. Gullibility is a weakness and only fills the pockets of others. In times when new ideas are fished every day from the sea, where everything is about saving energy, it is not surprising that “Drink water from the tap can be heard” again and again. A trend that limits the citizens even more and our conscience. I think it's not good.

How would it be with. You have to adapt the production sites and the industries in an environmentally friendly way by converting them and building new plants in a friendly way. Then we automatically get the best of every generation that engineering has to offer. It must be designed so that it can still be updated decades later. With Gretha Thunberg a new chapter on climate and environmental protection was started. Finally there is a big stage with a young leading actress who has found her way and her calling. Created with a sign in hand, but alone with a message that addressed all of us. Climate protection has become trendy and is suddenly appealing to more young people than ever before. But trends are limited in time, as history shows. The half-life of trends is very mixed.

At www.Statista.com you can definitely find something here!

What is constant except here and now ...

Science changes its work every few years and sometimes even every few days, thus 100-folds the point of view on previous results. A misleading but exciting instrument.

By drinking tap water, we can all do our part to save energy, I think that is now clear to everyone. It protects the doorbell bag and our nature. As always, the battle is fought on the shoulders of the citizens. Citizens make the most mess because you live the way you want to live. This is roughly the average reading in many magazines. Do more of this and do more of it, just don't live the way you want. Bla bla bla. Public opinion speaks what it has previously read in magazines and seen on TV. Talking mainstream and not having your own opinion is easy and convenient. Almost like, it is eaten what comes on the table. Thinking is not everyone's cup of tea. If you listen to the citizens chatting on the street sometimes, or even the neighbors, you have the feeling that a television is talking there. There is parroting what the stuff holds. Is that the real reason why young people only have music on their ears?

No matter where you meet them. Has the world become like "And the marmot greets you every day" New information and interesting dialogues have become rare. This is just a variable of a society as you can find it. Welcome. After all, some directors are breaking new ground to permanently change dialogues and communication. To mention here: Quentin Tarantino.

In order to find my way back to the topic of water, I briefly outline a few key data. By drinking tap water for a long time I have noticed almost imperceptible gradual changes in overall well-being. Above all, degradation of vitality can be emphasized, attitude towards life and positive energy + an overall good well-being. How can this be justified? Fortunately, nature has built in dozens of adjusting screws to circle the problem, why man A or B is doing badly! But if you have changed something in your way of life or your habits, it is obvious to look there first. In my case, switching to tap water. The tap water that we use in Germany has a low proportion of minerals and a high lime content. Few minerals are good for flushing out pollutants and cleansing the body, were it not for the many pollutants that do not belong in the water. The experts explain it this way. Minerals Rich water is a fully fueled car, it can't take much with us on our way through the body, of course the tank is almost full. But that is exactly what it is and is one of the main tasks of water in our human biological system. In times when we are demonstrably less concerned with healthy eating, the stress in the body increases per se. The body has to put a shovel on it so that there is no jam when cleaning. But that's exactly what happens to many, people have jams in the process of breaking down substances that are often read "detox". The additional burden of water has to be compensated for, unless we do not adapt additional activities or habits that promote the flushing out. The food industry is celebrating once again because sales of your products are unbroken. At the expense of our health.At this point it should be said that the curriculum in schools like Our education system is structured, all topics relating to health only vaguely or hardly deal with. One wonders, shouldn't health be essential when students go to school to learn? After all, it is economically the taxpayers of tomorrow. So what use are these to us if each of the children achieves limited performance at> 30 years and spends a large part of everyday life restoring their own health or maintaining it. The price of an inadequate educational policy!

The tap water - drinking water is low in minerals, as already mentioned this is good, but if it weren't for that! Who likes the strong contradiction ?! Well, the many substances that you can no longer remove from the drinking water cycle can influence the overall well-being in my view. Not overnight, but with drinking tap water from the tap, this is quite conceivable. There are no long-term studies on this. Which tap water drinker would also see the cause of the water. As a citizen, one thinks of 100 other things, but ultimately of the 70% we are made up of, the water.

To remind you again of what you can find in tap water, I list these unsavory acquaintances:

Pesticides from fertilizers Insects & crop protection agents - Remnants of medication - Hormones - Heavy metals - Chemical substances in traces - Bacteria - Viruses.

(Exact information can be found here: link)